Any proposal to limit motorcycle access to Malaysian highways needs to be carefully studied. This was said by Transport Minister Anthony Loke, with examination of any proposal’s impact and effectiveness.
Loke said any proposal may be forwarded but carefully studied for its feasibility and real-world impact, reports the New Straits Times. “There are various proposals being submitted, including from highway operators such as PLUS Malaysia Berhad but whether they are practical or not needs to be assessed,” he said at a press conference here today after attending the Transport Ministry’s 2026 New Year Address.
Suggestions have been forwarded to limit motorcycles on highways during specific time periods or capacity levels to reduce conflict with other vehicles, especially during peak periods. This follows a sharp rise in road fatalities involving motorcyclists over the last three years.
“Among the factors to be considered is whether such proposals would affect other road users who genuinely need to use highways to reach their destinations,” said Loke. Loke added, “We know there may be benefits from a safety perspective, particularly in preventing highways from becoming venues for illegal racing.”
Police statistics attributed speeding, reckless riding and violations of traffic regulations amongst the main factors contributing to yearly increase in road deaths. Loke clarified the matter does not fall entirely under the Transport ministry’s jurisdiction, as it also involves the Malaysian Highway Authority (MHA), the Works Ministry and highway concessionaires.

AI-generated Summary ✨
Comments show mixed reactions to limiting motorcycle access on Malaysian highways. Some support the idea, citing safety, noise reduction, and road maintenance concerns, advocating for toll charges or restricted lanes. Others argue enforcement is key, criticize unfair treatment, and emphasize that most motorcyclists follow laws responsibly. Several suggest banning certain types, like big bikes or cubs, or restricting hours. A minority question the fairness or practicality, reflecting diverse opinions on the proposal’s implementation and fairness.