>They used the excuse that "people have to much stuff on their feed" but we all know that is BS.
It's really not BS. People's feeds are flooded with content from tons of sources.
Why would posts from company that I've 'liked' get guaranteed display when family/friends/friends-of-friends don't get that treatment. Moreover what if I've 'liked' 100+ bands/restaurants/celebrities/businesses/news-sources, they can easily produce enough posts each day that I would never scroll far enough see all of it, nor would I want to.
The thing you want already exists and is called a newsletter.
It's not really a choice between a feed tuned to extract cash from small businesses and a newsletter though, is it? People were seeing my business's posts without any complaint until Facebook throttled the reach. I was also a Facebook user at that time, and didn't notice any particular problem either from pages that I follow. Now we get to see what Facebook thinks makes the most money for itself.
It's really not BS. People's feeds are flooded with content from tons of sources.
Why would posts from company that I've 'liked' get guaranteed display when family/friends/friends-of-friends don't get that treatment. Moreover what if I've 'liked' 100+ bands/restaurants/celebrities/businesses/news-sources, they can easily produce enough posts each day that I would never scroll far enough see all of it, nor would I want to.
The thing you want already exists and is called a newsletter.