The Wayback Machine - https://web.archive.org/web/20110127164053/http://techcrunch.com/2010/01/28/ipad-extras/
The Subplots Of The iPad Blockbuster
MG Siegler
Jan 28, 2010

Obviously, yesterday was all about the iPad. Actually, today is too. There have been thousands of stories already written about the device (including something like two dozen on TechCrunch alone), but a few points seem to be completely overshadowed by the glow of the iPad itself. Let’s revisit those.

The A4

While only a few people really picked up on it, in my mind, the biggest news yesterday was not about the iPad itself, but rather about what powers it. Apple has created a new processor, the A4, a customized ARM A9 processor. Never mind that it appears to match the specs of the Snapdragon (the chip inside the Nexus One), the key point is that Apple is now in control of their processors. Is there really any doubt that these Apple-designed chips will end up in the next iterations of the iPhone from here on out?

One of the things that makes Apple well, Apple, is the tight integration they weave between their hardware and software. That’s because, for the most part, they’re absolutely in charge of both unlike many other companies that do either one or the other. But for chips, Apple has still had to rely on outside parties to provide those. And in most cases, they’re the same chips that everyone else is using — Intel (in the Macs) or Samsung-built ARM chips (in the iPhone). There’s a reason Steve Jobs and Apple VP of Hardware Engineering, Bob Mansfield, were touting these new chips and their built-in GPU and power management systems yesterday during the keynote. With the A4, Apple really is in charge of the whole system.

And when you consider a key quote from Jobs yesterday, “Apple is a mobile devices company,” it’s not hard to imagine that Apple hopes to create its own chips for all of its products one day — including the Macs. The 2008 acquisition of P.A. Semi has allowed them to do this. And just two years later, they’re clearly taking advantage of it. This was the big revelation yesterday.

iPhone OS

While it was somewhat surprising that the iPad runs on the iPhone OS rather than a separate (but similar) derivative, even more surprising may be that Apple announced the launch of the iPhone OS 3.2 SDK specifically for developers to get to work on making apps for the iPad. On one hand, it now makes complete sense why we haven’t seen an iPhone OS update in over three months — Apple was holding it back for the iPad launch. But on the other, why is iPhone OS 3.2 iPad-only right now? Wouldn’t you think a major product like the iPad would be worthy of an update to iPhone OS 4.0?

Well, I have heard from a couple of sources that iPhone OS 4.0 is definitely coming along and soon. Usually, Apple shows off major iPhone SDK iterations in March so developers have some time to get used to the changes before the new OS rolls out alongside new iPhone hardware in the June or July timeframe. That would seem to be the case again. Since Apple wants to ship the first iPads in 60 days (the Wi-Fi version), iPhone OS 4.0 was likely out of the question. But I’d bet it will still be unveiled sometime in the next few months. And it seems likely that it will ship this summer for both the a new iPhone and the iPad.

And with it, we could also see something that a lot of people were disappointed was missing from the iPad launch: the ability to run multiple applications at once. Since last summer, when I heard that Apple was definitely thinking about the problem, all I’ve heard is vague references to it being a priority to figure out. Now, with this new A4 processor (which again, I’d be shocked if we don’t see in the next iPhone), computing power clearly isn’t an issue. More importantly, power consumption shouldn’t be as big of an issue anymore either. Apple claims you’ll be able to get 10 hours of use from the iPad (on Wi-Fi) — and that’s with a huge screen sucking up much of the power. Just imagine what they think they can squeeze out of an iPhone with this chip (though yes, a much smaller battery).

Google

While Apple didn’t say much about Google during the event, Jobs did note that the Maps application on the iPad was equipped with the Google Maps backend. And despite the talk that Apple might be in discussions with Microsoft about making Bing the default search on the iPhone, Google remains the default on the iPad as well.

He also demoed full YouTube integration on the device — including YouTube in HD.

Google and Apple are definitely growing apart as they continue to compete, but with the iPad, at least for now, they seem cool.

There Will Be Apps

While the focus of the iPad event in terms of apps seemed to be on iPhone apps that would work on the iPad, it’s important to remember that developers are going to start developing apps specifically for the iPad. A few showed off their apps ported to the iPad for the event, but developers will also be able to create apps just for the iPad. This will be more important than a lot of people realize right now.

Jobs’ Off-The-Glass Pass

One other thing that struck me as odd during the keynote yesterday was the point where Jobs pointed out the price analysts had predicted for the iPad. Normally, Apple doesn’t do things like this. In basketball, from time to time when players decide they want to showboat, they throw the ball against the backboard to pass it to themselves so they can score. Jobs’ move yesterday, in my eyes, was largely the same thing.

As I laid out a few weeks ago, it seems pretty likely that it was Apple that leaked much of the information to The Wall Street Journal about the tablet device prior to its launch — including the bogus $1,000 price from “analysts.” Later, a former Apple employee corroborated this. Why would they do this? It’s simple. As I said at the time, if they plant the idea in peoples’ minds that a product will be $1,000, then release it for significantly cheaper, it’s a huge win for Apple. So when Jobs announced the entry-level iPad would be $499 yesterday, it was an absolute home run.

Don’t get me wrong, it’s a masterstroke of manipulating the media, but it’s still a showboating move.

Advertisement
  • Related Topics
Advertisement
  • http://facebook.com/therebelion Amar Patel

    I was one of those few.

  • http://www.matutam.com Kevin Stich

    The thing that bothers me about the iPad is its wasted potential. I see it as a flash-less media consumption device and nothing more. A web cam and standard USB port (along with multitasking) would go a long way in making it not a device for just baby-boomers, but for the massive amounts of somewhat computer knowledgeable “generation Y.”

    The new chip is great, congrats for Apple for freeing themselves from part of the chain of requirements in building their new hardwares. I wouldn’t be surprised, though, to see that the A4 is only as fast as it seems in conditions where multitasking isn’t possible. It’s snappy, but so far only snappy at playing music while doing one other thing.

    I have this horrible creeping suspicion that the iPad is really just a precursor to the iPad 3G (and iPad 3GS) where the features that should have been there from the beginning get added later for a fee.

  • Leo

    I have found you post on blogs’ iPad hype a bit funny… yes, TechCrunch was not the n°1, but when I’m reading around this is the only place where I can only find “desperately” positive posts on the matter… come on, even on this you are presenting what is missing as “coming soon”… Admit you delusion yourselves, maybe it will come, but it IS missing now. It will ease your life ;)

  • http://www.addtoany.com/ Pat

    Love the basketball analogy. :)

  • http://www.wearespoke.com creativereason

    I thought the chip was probably an overlooked detail during the presentation, but I’m still baffled they didn’t nail down multitasking before they released it (even if it meant delaying the product):

    iPad is clearing missing these things:
    - Multi-tasking
    - A camera (video chatting from your couch seems like a no-brainer)
    - Flash (as Adobe has pointed out since, this is more about politics than the ability to run it at this point)

    Apps will be developed for the iPad that will take advantage of it’s form factor (as Joe Hewitt, of all people pointed out – http://joehewitt.com/post/ipad/)
    and other web developers will specialize sites to run on the iPad using HTML5 features (which I assume could include office 2010 live as an alternative to iWork).

    Its a cool device and would be great for someone like my wife who mainly browses the web, uses office and checks emails, facebook, etc. Much cheaper for these items (with more features like the iBooks etc) than the 13″ MacBook Pro she has now.

  • Daniel

    Agreed.

  • http://tariq-kamal.livejournal.com/ T-Boy

    Obviously, yesterday was all about the iPad. Actually, today is too.

    Oh. I thought since last week also the tech blogosphere stopped reporting about technology and had changed their mission to “engaging in endless intellectual masturbation about the Apple Tablet / iPad”.

    I was wrong? See, I didn’t get the memo.

  • Luc

    @kevin
    You got the point. Apple is never going to serve a “full meal” to it’s clients from the beginning.
    I’m quite sure that Apple was able to insert copy paste and release a 3g model for the iphone from the beginning, beacause practically under the hood of the iphones and ipods touch is the same thing , and it’s been that same thing from the day the first iphone launch, which means they were capable of much more. In conclusion Apple bets that even without flash multitasking a webcam etc there will be pleanty o early adopters. After that when the sales will drop they will come out with IPAD 2 which will have a webacam, and then IPAD 3 with multitasking and so on and so on , until they are ready to releasa a whole new product.It’s their way of doing things.

  • christosxx2

    Well, again all positive from techcrunch….
    Photos of the ipad showing movies (star trek). But nobody mentions (again) how the movies will end up on the ipad. If you buy the 16G you can upload (by use of the extra Apple cables, docking station, etc.) max. 1 movie, considering you also have photos and more on the device (again uploaded by using the apple extra costly things). So, all the time you need to dock the ipad, delete the movie you just saw, copy the new one on it…how long does it take? You need to be at home to do it (yes), you need a dvd/cd, thus an extra computer to do it? All this to sit then on your couch and watch the movie on the 10″ screen? Does not make sense. Why else? To take the 1 movie with you on holiday and watch it on the plane? And then, the remaining days (ok, going to the beach and having fun is also an option of course :) ).

    It’s a nice device, cool to look at, but let’s be honet, they could have done so much more with it. As it is, it’s quite “useless” for most things and people.

  • mg fanboi

    agree, but MG is too much of a fanboi to admit that there are issues with the product…. It sucks because he will stay true to his style, and for the next 3 or 4 weeks we will be stuck with at least one story a day about iPad will change the world crap…

  • Lex

    A4. why bother. getting their asses handed to them by intel wasn’t bad enough the first time around?

    iphone OS. for people that can’t walk and chew gum at the same time.

    Google. bleh. Until Apple can do better, they know which side their bread is buttered.

    Apps. iPad specific SDK will be about as useful as a soiled ‘pad’ in six months when app developers realize the market for the ‘pad’ is tiny and stick to iphone+touch.

    Job’s Off the Glass pass. Apple fanbois will buy anything. Damn event looked like the 1984 commercial except without the chick running down the aisle with a hammer.

    ol’ Steve was most likely beating the crap out of the PR flak that let him show the NY Times page with the ‘f’ on it. Apple launch eventwise, this will probably be remembered as one of the worst.

  • JewJew

    I admire your ability to write an article where each section ends by refuting what it says in the beginning, and otherwise rehashes obvious facts. In the end, you say absolutely nothing, but of course get some eyeballs.

    Bravo. Wanker.

  • Leo

    I don’t really want him to change… I’m no mac fanboy thus I apreciate reading about the point of view of the other side of the world… but he should get real on this, and talk about what the iPad “has” and “is”… there is no product that can change the world with what hypothetically will have on the next semester… that’s all.

  • http://www.isights.org/ Michael Long

    Considering that the device is 60-90 days from shipping, it’s not missing yet. No one has seen the production version.

  • http://www.webwednesday.com.sg Joe@singapore

    I have read lots of iPad stuff, and I don’t understand why people (especially geeks) don’t GET IT! We have watch sci-fi for years from StarTrek to BSG to whatever … and in most of them, someone is using a tablet interface to interact with the network or whatever. So IMHO, Apple has come up with something that is going to be easy to use and will live up to what we imagine this interface would be.

    I am going to buy one and leave it for my young kids to play around with and use. why? because this is the future.

    I certainly disagree with Apple that it is “revolutionary”. BUT it is EVOLUTIONARY.

    So EVOLVE already, people.

  • Frank

    this sounds like a huge waste of money… and a LOT of wasted potential too :-/

  • paul baldovin

    I agree that Apple being in control of their processors is a big deal.

  • steve

    We don’t need stinking flash…. fullstop. :).

    Flash will be in legacy replaced by html5

  • magnum

    One of the reasons why Apple didn’t put the ‘things that we dream about’ for the iPad (GPS, Camera, etc) is because it loves dearly — its other products so much (iPhone, iPodtouch, iPod) — Imagine, if Apple put all the ‘good stuff’ inside the iPad? For sure, it’ll cannibalize the sales on their other iDevices, perhaps even on MAC PC/Notebook.

    Remember? When iPod touch was release, and people were disappointed ‘coz it has no camera and a GPS. Reason? If Apple put those things, the only difference between it, and the iPhone is the ‘Call/SMS capability’ . Obviously, it’ll hurt the sales of the iPhone.

    Seriously, Apple is just repeating the history. Hopefully, the users will notice it.

    More details: Details: http://bit.ly/apple-tablet-under-fire

  • http://garysheynkman.com Gary Sheynkman

    Man I love TC but there is reporting and there is hype

    from Engadget Article:

    For some of us, amid all the hubbub about revolutions and whatnot yesterday, the most significant announcement on hand was Apple’s supposedly custom A4 CPU.

    Alas, in the cold and brutal light of the morning after, we’re hearing that it is in fact a system-on-a-chip driven by a Cortex-A9 MPCore CPU “identical” to the one found inside NVIDIA’s Tegra 2, while besting the iPhone 3GS significantly with its 1GHz speed and multicore architecture. The A4 is composed of that Cortex barnburner, an integrated memory controller, and the Mali GPU, making it an all ARM affair — though we still don’t know how much Apple and PA Semi did in terms of arranging and integrating those components within the silicon. While still not 100 percent confirmed, it would seem there were no revolutions on the iPad’s processing front — just a rebranded bit of well engineered hardware.

  • http://www.ipadawan.fr iPadawan

    Waiting for the next iPad keynote : )

  • http://www.leadsexplorer.com LEADS Explorer

    The reason Steven Jobs said: “the most important thing I’ve ever done”
    is because:
    Apple has developed its’ own processor.
    The risks taken are immense: if Apple cannot sell in volume, the depreciation of:
    - the development (+ acquisition of the company)
    - the planned / reserved production capacity
    Can kill the profits of Apple in 2010.

    This is why the iPad was “the most important thing I’ve ever done”

  • http://www.fanfooty.com.au/blog Paul Montgomery

    An off-the-glass pass followed by a home run? Truly, Jobs can do anything.

  • dru

    Wow. What a lousy article. It’s like a game of telephone. You know NOTHING about the actual A4 but come off like you have detailed information on it. Instead you like to a site that pulls info from Apple Insider who admit it’s just speculation.

    On the “show boating” accusation you claim the “analysts” comment was planted while your own speculative link demonstrated WSJ itself put a specific analyst to the $1000 price point in its own earlier piece. I like how you use the telephone game as “proof” Apple was leaking false info to WSJ to build hype.

    Useless piece, shoddy analysis and devoid of facts but great for page hits I’m sure.

  • Apple Fans

    Haha! You guys got dupped! Almost all your sources were wrong. Engadget predicted better.

  • Jeff

    I agree. MG’s unadulterated love for Apple and Google is…grinding. The bit about Apple and Google “still being good” is so MG.

    The tech community has spoken out about the iPad and has deemed it underwhelming. Yet on TC all you will read are glowing articles. It’s head scratching.

  • Cooke

    Wow Seigler! Youre still trying to push it as a blockbuster arent you?! When it’s not!!! Look at the reviews at Engadget, even at CrunchGear, at Ars. They dont like it. You are the only one and your moronic Guest Authors who love it. Enough with your fanboyism, so go and continue licking Steve Job’s ass. Dumbass!

  • BoloMKXXVIII

    The processor is basically a stock ARM processor. What makes it different is it is a SOC. Graphics and memory controller are onboard.

    http://www.brightsideofnews.com/news/2010/1/27/apple-a4-soc-unveiled—its-an-arm-cpu-and-the-gpu!.aspx

  • http://www.noflashforipad.com No Flash For iPad

    You’re all missing the point here: apps, apps, apps. It’s always been about that (See early MSFT vs. AAPL was, gates vs. jobs, later the iPhone etc.). Everyone understand people would buy hardware only if the apps are there. For the iPod, the app was music, for the early days windows, it was Excel and Word.
    The only way for the iPad to succeed is if it has a critical mass of applications that will make people buy it. are books that killer app? not sure, the device is too expansive to do just that.

  • Michael

    Spot on MG. Great analysis of the underlying revelations.

    Also interesting that the iPad will run an iPhone OS rather than a Mac OS version (which most predicted). I wonder if OS X will suffer with the advancement of this “mobile devices company”.

  • harry

    Its a beautiful first generation device and nothing else comes close and Apple will become bigger than Microsoft. The only problem is Steve’s health.

  • Justin

    I’m sorry… do any of you actually have an iPad in your possession? How can you sit here and say that it’s crap or great when you don’t even know what you would use it for. Apps will make or break this device, not what Apple has already shown you. The iPhone was a great phone but now with all of the apps it’s a great device capable of doing hundreds of things. And as for the article… it’s an observation of what has been presented to the writer. He has a blog that thousands of people read every day including you haters that post here. If you don’t like it don’t read it!

  • http://coderslike.us David Kavanagh

    Until I went to the WWDC last June, I never really thought about how heavy they pour the cream and sugar over everything. They make everything sound richer and sweeter than it actually is. I suppose that’s par for marketing folks, but Apple does this so well. Then, i listen to the fanboys eat it up! Don’t get me wrong, I love Apple product, but I’m more of a cynical fanboy. Some of the words I hear make me just think “oh, come on!”

  • http://www.koona.com Tomas Sancio

    As @pkedrosky mentioned, the iPad is probably not meant to leave your “pad” (i.e. house) much so if you have a fast Wi-Fi connection, you won’t need to sync much with a cable.

  • Dan

    When have they ever added secret features after a product demo?

  • JB

    Also, if they put everything into a first-generation model, there wouldn’t much else to add for a 2nd generation model.

    Apple knows they need to add more features as the years go by so that people will buy newer models.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Dino_Muhic/100000126047313 Dino Muhic

    I’m sick of people saying HTML5 will replace flash.
    Everyone just looks at the video playback of HTML5 but flash is much more than video and some bad ads. HTML5 + JavaScript don’t even come close to what flash can do.

    This is just an example of great flash integration: http://www.hotel626.com

    You will NEVER be able to do things like that just using HTML5 and JS.
    Flash is a very important aspect in web design and augmendted reality, even to 3D in some extent so just keep dreaming of HTML5 and JS replacing Flash, IT WON’T HAPPEN!

  • Rick

    Why would you purchase a closed apple system for a touchscreen tablet, when you can go PC and choose from dozens of tablet manufacturers (instead of one) that provide better looking devices at better prices, and you get access to all the billions of “apps”, a good part of them free, already developed in the PC environment?

  • Mike P

    I’ve really enjoyed watching MG make lemonade out of lemons the past couple days. No matter how you slice it the device is a disappointment. No one said it better than Engadget’s Joshua Topolsky…the word that best describes it is “unimaginative”.

  • Joe Anonymous

    All the complainers are missing the point. This is not a laptop replacement. It is a simple media device for ‘the rest of us’. To address the specific complaints:

    Multitasking – it DOES multitask (just like iPhones). You can listen to music while browsing the web. You can browse the web while talking on the phone. You can get your email while playing a game. It doesn’t multitask their party apps, but why would you want to play two games simultaneously or browse the web while playing a game?

    Camera – this complaint really misses the point. Are you going to use an 8 x 10 device to take pictures? I doubt it. It just doesn’t make sense. You’ll use your iPhone (or dedicated camera) for that.

    Flash – I can live without flash and I’d rather not have my battery life reduced by 50% because of it. Youtube is leading the way to replacing Flash with html5 – and Apple’s stance on the iPhone and iPad will encourage that. Flash stinks.

    Storage – 64 GB will be plenty for the casual user. I have 55 GB of movies on my Mac – but that’s 30 movies at reasonably high resolution. What most people will do is carry a couple of movies from the iTunes store with them when they travel. It’s not meant as a device to store ALL your stuff. That’s what your laptop or desktop computer is for.

    Uses – those of you claiming it’s no more than a big iPhone are missing the point. You’re limited by your own creativity. For example, I plan to buy one or two of these to take to trade shows. When talking with a customer, you can pick up the iPad and show them presentations of your products – far, far easier than using a laptop to do it. Or, with appropriate apps, this could be a godsend for Doctors making their rounds.

    Expandability – there just isn’t room for all the ports people are requesting. Furthermore, which ones are universally needed? Most users won’t need ANY adapters, but if you want them, they’ll be available. Apple was right not to clutter up the device with every possible port that anyone might want.

    Data input – Great solution. These devices won’t be used for writing the great American novel. The keyboard will mostly be used for notes and email. While I haven’t used it, the iPhone is great for short emails and this looks even better. AND you can add an external keyboard if you do have a ton of writing to do.

    Bezel – Everyone’s complaining about how ugly the bezel is. Whether that’s true or not, it’s necessary. You have to hold onto this thing and you don’t want to be triggering multitouch every time you pick it up. The alternative (have the screen go clear to the edge but leave a border which isn’t touch sensitive) makes even less sense – too confusing.

    There are always complaints that Apple is already planning to add features (camera, whatever) to future versions in order to sell more devices. IMHO, that’s nonsense. Apple could sell MORE devices if it were full featured from the start. It seems (based on the iPhone development) that Apple set a release date and included everything they were ready to include. Some things either made no sense to Apple or were not ready. As Apple finds elegant ways to do things (copy/paste, for example), they add them. No conspiracy needed.

    I wish people would stop equating “I don’t want one” with “No one will buy one”. You’re not the target demographic, fine. But they will sell a zillion of these. I’m buying a couple for presentations and probably one for home.

  • tmay

    A4 is most probably using PowerVR graphics just as the 3GS is, not ARM’s Mali GPU. Why would Apple make life more difficult for developers by switching GPU’s with the iPad?

    So, in fact the A4 is quite a bit more customized than most here would acknowledge. Most of the people who have had their hands on the iPad acknowledge that it does in fact have a very fast UI experience.

  • http://www.softwareindustryinsights.com Glenn Gruber

    MG, I agree that there is a lot of benefit to having control of the silicon, and further I think that between iPads, iPhones and iTouches that there should be decent volume. But that volume will not be near what Intel Atom and other chips will see across so many different brands and devices. So while the performance benefit of integration will be there for Apple, I worry about the pricing advantage they are giving up to Android-based devices which will leverage COTS components. Apple has never competed directly on price, but there are limits. Because of the volume they will achieve, Apple won’t feel the pain as acutely as they did with the PowerPC, but it will put them at a disadvantage.

  • johnsonsbrand

    … do you really think your wife is going to have one and you’re not!! hehe, I see you having at least 2 upon arrival. (you just don’t get it yet)

  • johnsonsbrand

    … by definition, isn’t a wanker, someone who starts at one place, only to keep going back and forth refuting the previous stroke. But at the end, realizes much more than he started with…

  • mrvco

    Surely you can’t expect people to read that mess and then click on your link… can you?

  • http://SeanAzulPhotographer.com Sean

    I think chip design must be part of their longterm strategy if they want to continue to make the margins they currently command.

    With the advent of Windows 7 and the sharing of the intel chips in their line of computers, the difference between Mac and PC is dwindling.

  • Marcos

    I agree that for sites built entirely on flash where slick presentation is required, there will be no substitute. However, most people complaining about lack of Flash support on a device like the iPhone are not complaining because they can’t access a website for that cool new bar (that did the mistake of not having a non-flash version of their site), but rather navigation menus not working, slide shows, and videos not playing on sites that use Flash as a component of am mostly HTML driven site.

  • johnsonsbrand

    … because the iPad IS better than all of those PCs you are speaking of. It really is that simple!

    … in life you can either lead or follow, looks like you prefer to follow a path of antiquated PCs.

    Apple prefers to lead. (But, hay, don’t worry, PC’s will follow yet again). History is funny that way.

  • Dan

    people don’t want the camera to take photos joe, they want it for video chat. duh

  • http://www.webwednesday.com.sg Joe@singapore

    Why? Because of usability. Maybe my kids are simpler than others, but Apple’s UI is bloody easy to use. Forget the proprietary system, think about usability. This is how things will be. The PC environment is too messy and UNintuitive.

    Eventually all interfaces will be made this way. For now, Apple’s is the closest.

  • Gregory Pierce

    That and its simply easier and more predictable to build an interface in Flash than it is in HTML5 at the moment.

  • Brian

    HTML5 will replace flash.

  • Steve W

    You’re ignoring the biggest thing about the iPad – it’s size. The iPad battery is more than 6 times the size of the iPod Touch battery – 25 Whrs vs 985 mAhrs @ 3.75V. The iPad consumes A LOT more power than the iPod Touch.

    Flash and Multi-tasking will cause the same problems on the iPad that they cause on the iPhone, or the iMac for that matter.

  • Salvapatria

    Well, it can happen can’t it? I think this is a battery with a touch screen, no multitask, no camera and no bigger harddrive because it will consume much more energy, and, how refrigerate it, well, MORE ENERGY!

    forget about 10 hours with multitask

  • Brian

    Every verion of OS X is very portable. They can go back to Intel or whatever chip later if they deem it necessary. Right now, it gives them a huge advantage in profitability, control, etc…

    This is the ‘other shoe’ dropping on a very lame-duck MSFT. All they need to do next is come out with a low end Mac that is based on the A4 and DOESN’T run Windoze–as an ENTRY level Mac.

    Very few would even miss the windows ‘compatibility’ but the more technically inclined (or really slow Windows users) would still be able to get the INtel Mac that runs literally all software on the planet (as it does now).

  • Brian

    Because you program to the Apple API, not the chip directly. It makes no difference in development.

  • ->V

    BTW, the iPad HAS GPS, a digital compass and an accellerometer.

  • Brian

    Don’t forget the problems FLASH causes on desktops and laptops! It’s the most common cause of a ‘crash’ on the Mac (though, in Snow Leopard, it doesn’t affect the browser, you simply get a message that Flash is hung).

    It is about politics to a point as well. Adobe ‘went PC’ in the late 90′s despite them making their entire business off of Apple technology, and also refused to allow Apple to use postscript in OS X Aqua. That was not nice, and Adobe, if they had any common sense at all, would get around to making amends. They were the ones that left Apple for dead!

  • Salvapatria

    because, is apple! hahahahahaha

    Come on, if there are so much better offer in tablet market, why are we all talking about the ipad????

    This is state of the art, good or bad, is the best so far

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Drew_Izzo/588928798 Drew Izzo

    They’re not quite in charge of the “whole system” They still need their own 3G network….

  • Phil

    If HTML5 could actually replace Flash, then there would be no reason not to include a dynamic converter in the OS itself that converted Flash .swf’s into equivalent HTML5.

    The drooling idiots who insist that HTML5 will somehow replace Flash overnight should wipe off their chins and think about that for a second.

  • http://www.flickr.com/photos/PACMan3000/ Paul Chapel

    The tech community doesn’t decide what becomes popular. If it were up to the tech community, the iPod wouldn’t have become popular, everyone would hate the App Store (regular people don’t) and everyone would be buying WinMo phones based on the stupid spec sheets that geeks like so much.

  • Phil

    I wonder which company would find it in their interest to sabotage the release of the Crunchpad by quietly using a shell company to “invest” in the “JooJoo” (and guarantee its failure via lawsuits, etc.) right before the release of an inadequate turkey of a tablet computer?

    Not normally a conspiracy theorist but it almost makes sense.

  • Steve W

    The animosity goes all the back to MacDraw (and MacProject), software Apple bundled with their first memory upgrade. Adobe threatened to stop developing for the Mac if Apple continued to release “free” software that duplicated the functionality of Adobe products. Microsoft was all that happy about MacProject, but they were already pissed because the Apple refused to bundle Microsoft Basic with the Macintosh.

  • http://www.koona.com Tomas Sancio

    The original Mac had a Motorola processor, then IBM. Apple never made its own.

  • patcito

    You forgot Canvas, WebGL and SVG. With those and fast JS engines you can do everything flash does and probably more.

  • Tony

    Apple will NEVER let flash run on the iPhone/iTouch/iPad because it undermines the entire app store. Apple wants to be the moral gate keeper for every program that runs on the device and wants to collect a toll for every program sold. It does not want any other way for a program to be run on the device. Clearly, having Flash/AIR on the device could completely destroy that ecosystem. There are millions of Flash programmers who could write their apps for the iPad and sell them however they wanted and wherever they wanted, and not have to pay Apple. Another reason the iPad is running the iPhone OS and not OS X is that if it was running OS X, you could actually install your own programs, Flash/AIR or not, and Apple wouldn’t get a piece of it. Adobe has announced that people will be able to CONVERT their Flash programs to a program that can SOLD through the app store, if Apple approves it however. Imagine that. Wake up people! Give me my touch screen tablet with Windows 7 that can do everything and so much more than an iPad and I’ll buy whatever programs I want from anywhere I choose, even if Apple doesn’t approve!

  • http://founderscoop.com Chris DeVore

    Great stuff, MG – on the developer front I just pulled some interesting stats about developer appetite for iPad SDK info from iPhoneDevSDK (the biggest indir forum for iPhone developers). And while it’s not a landslide, the data support your thesis: http://crashdev.blogspot.com/2010/01/do-iphone-developers-care-about-ipad.html

  • Kyle

    Sorry about your dumb children.

  • http://www.backtype.com/MichaelADeBose Michael A. De Bose

    I don’t see Apple’s stand on Flash in terms of what it means to Adobe. Instead I consider the number of Developers that are impacted by this and the number of users impacted by this. Flash is a rich environment for everyone that participates in it. As an end user, I don’t care being told by the Apple, ‘There’s nothing to see here, move on..’.

    As I’ve said before Apple is really getting too big for their britches. There was a time when Apple’s users were flaming developers for not targeting Apple’s wares and now instead you have Apple doing it themselves with their dictates to developers and then to just summarily say ‘nope’ to Flash as a whole says very bad things to me. They may justify it with user experience, but I as a user justify for myself what I wish to experience. I’d be the first to tell you that I get tire of Safari choking and dying on Flash, but I just restart and go at it again. Yes I run FF and Opera and several other browsers, but at the end of the day I decide what I will view and whether or not its worth my time and resources.

  • ARHANGEL123

    iPad will not change the word you r 100% right. But i think most of the current reaction is driven by the hype that preceded tablet’s release… Too much hype, too much expectations. Public got way too excited. Apple really needs someone working on their controlled leaks better.
    So far the major bummer would be the absence of flash.
    10hr battery life – better than the industry standard and definetly better than on comparable size windows based tablets.
    iPhone OS with no multitasking – good and bad. Thus it is good as well established entertainment OS with thouthands of apps that are multi-touch friendly. Bad because of multitasking absence.
    Bottom line – you need it you buy it. Though in any way it won’t perform miracles for you….

    Personally i will wait few months before i will buy one. I want to see full spectrum on news and opinions. I want to see an unboxing and full review. I want to see first jailbreak before i buy one.

  • Seth

    Then don’t read it….since when does an author have to either write what you agree with or write nothing?

  • Richard

    Why hasn’t anyone mentioned that the ipad will save all newspapers and magazines? Why won’t the itunes model work on the ipad?

  • http://www.homecareassistance.com simon

    it looks….so….ugly…

    aesthetically speaking

  • GQB

    Because I want an interface that is designed from the ground up (both OS and apps) for touch interface, not something bolted on top of a keyboard/mouse interface.

    If I want ‘open’, I’ll work on my Mac (or suffer through using my Windows machine at work), but after 2 years of heavy use, I can honestly say that I NEVER yearn for ‘open’ on my iPhone, and will enjoy having a larger screen when I get my iPad.

  • http://www.deeperhouse.com Peter Reis

    bingo.

  • Ifone Winz

    You’re right that Apple wants to control the whole browsing experience in order to make lots of money. On the other hand, Windows 7 on a tablet will be a dog of a device just like all the failed Windows tablets before it. I’m sorry, but a 10″ Zune HD tablet will be as much of a failure as a normal Zune HD.

    You’d better just go back to using your normal ultimate road warrior machine, an underpowered $250 Atom-processor netbook choking on any Windows version. I’m sure it suits you perfectly.

  • dromard

    I love all these comments about “wasted potential” and lacking features. Apple doesn’t have to deliver the entire wish list at once. They never have. Jobs said that Apple wasn’t going to put video on the iPod because “who wants to watch video on that little display.” They rolled it out later on several models. iPhone came out with web-only (less Flash) apps to preserve the closed system. Later we had legitimate apps. You’ll never catch Apple saying, “Oh? We had no idea that was important.”

    There will be more feature-rich offerings from other manufacturers, but only Apple will be able to control the entire package (less third-party apps), including the processor. It will be hard to beat Apple’s quality, another benchmark for the segment.

    Sure everyone had a wish list and Apple only delivered on some items, but you can bet they will match consumer demand as this product evolves. For Apple, the iPad will justify the risk to build and market the product itself because they will sell a ton of them, naysayers be damned. But in a broader sense, this will be the flag bearer for the tablet space. It may never have everything everybody wants, but it will be the product that shapes the market and makes the segment legitimate.

  • D.Ray

    Why does the iPad need a USB port? It’s a *mobile* device, what are you going to connect to it?

    Also, what’s the point of a webcam? So it can look up your nose when you’re holding it in your lap?

    Plus, can you imagine a couple million iPad users trying to do video chats over a 3G network – and not just AT&T’s, that may web chats would bring down even Verizon’s supposedly better network.

  • Ray Cromwell

    Many mobile phone vendors use SoC designs that combine IP from multiple licensees – ARM CPU, TI or STM DSPs, STM GPU, etc. There’s nothing really amazing about what Apple’s done.

    If you look at NVidia’s Tegra 2 SoC that is going in tablets and netbooks, it’ll smoke the A4. Dual Cortex A9s, super-fast H264 encoding and decoding (12hrs playback of 1080p), NVidia GPU that can run Unreal Engine 3, etc.

    By the time the iPad ships, they’ll probably be tablets and netbooks with vastly superior CPU, GPU, and video capility w/better battery performance.

  • fulltext

    No, $499 is the right price for this device. I would have been willing to pay $999 plus options for a fully-functional computer, not an overgrown Ipod Touch.

    I’ll wait till v2.0, thank you

  • duke O'Connor

    Maybe I’m mistaken, but didn’t they change the top surface from plastic to glass after the 2007 launch but just before availability?

  • duke O'Connor

    Here’s what’s missing from most of these analyses. A killer app. Because it doesn’t exist yet. I know for a fact that many developers see a huge opportunity in this and feel that 1) the possibilities for new, breakthrough functionality are there and 2) if you pull that off there’s a reasonable chance you can make a lot of money.

  • http://bit.ly/Earl2076 Earlwin

    The 10 hour battery life is largely made possible to the LED backed screen, because of its low power consumption. I wonder if their battery life rating is based on idle with little activity? For example is this affected by what app you’re running, let’s say video vs. book? Often the answer is yes, but I wonder if that has changed since.

    Speaking of video Apple.Com has really got to move into Flash media. That downloadable (MOV) file for their homepage is atrocious. Imagine going to YouTube just to watch Steve Job’s keynote speech and iPad product demo, because they haven’t adopted Flash.

  • dan

    If Apple’s stance on flash means less websites are created in flash, all the better.

    Sites like hotel 626 are a blight on the web. The less of these crappy flash sites the better.

    The only thing i miss from flash is the video support.

  • robinson

    I agree with you that the $1,000 price leaking was Apple directed and with a definite purpose in mind– but it seemed less showboating and more smart expectations management!

    Even to the extent it was showing off, it was well justified! I mean, even the non-Apple influenced observers were speculating that $600-$800 was the price *needed* but not that likely–and no one saw a $500 device coming!

    Brilliant!

  • Jahihiti

    Yes you CAN multitask with the iPhone and iPad. There’s no law stopping you from chewing gum while you are using the device(s).

    I multi-task all the time while using my iPhone for porn ! LOL!!!

  • dsect

    Windows 7 is just as much a defective toy as every other release. The difference between Mac and PC is not dwindling in the least.

    Has MSFT fixed the DLL problem? Have they got rid of the Registry? Does multitasking actually work for a change? Does their GUI finally give enough feedback? Have they finally figured out how to print without truncating half the data?

    Windoze is garbage and has pulled the programming profession down with it.

  • Lex

    I know. It’s just a facetious comment in regard to USB vs firewire mess.

    Apple have a long history of trying to force new hardware standards on everybody else, and there’s been more flops than successes. Looks like ol’ Jobs is going back to the same formula.

  • mmm…

    I guess you do not consider a laptop as a *mobile* device; I am glad.

    When you are on a short trip, a webcam is very handy to chat with your family. Web conferencing would be a great help for business even. This helps to keep your laptop in the bag sans very demanding tasks.

    New requirements push the limit and makes you grow; otherwise, we still be travelling in bullock carts.

  • http://www.matutam.com Kevin Stich

    USB/SD: It costs $100 for a storage upgrade. With 10 hours of video playback and only 16gb of storage, I’ll run out of movies before my battery is dead. If I already have a 120GB iPod with me, why can’t I use that as storage for more media? It costs $30 for a wonky looking set of USB/SD port add ons that most likely wont even support playing from those devices.

    Webcam: Video chatting my friends, family and coworkers (with the finally available VoIP capabilities of OS3.2,) would be impeccably easy. This thing isn’t only made to sit on your lap directly under your nose. Put it in a corner opposite of the home button and you’re perfectly fine. Don’t be so simple minded, you know that this will be in the iPad 2.

    Video Chat: There’s still wifi, and it costs $130 to get a 3G antenna. We’ve seen in the past that Apple has the power to lock communications to one wireless type (Slingbox comes to mind,) why can’t they do it again?

  • http://www.matutam.com Kevin Stich

    No it does not. GPS (assisted at that,) is only available in the WiFi + 3G model.

  • http://www.matutam.com Kevin Stich

    Eventually, HTML5 standards may be able to replace Flash. The problem is that HTML5 as a standard will not be complete and released until 2022, thats 12 YEARS.

    We live in the now, and now ~70% of interactive content online is in Flash. Deal with it. They are releasing this product in 60-90 days. If magically (haha) by that time Flash web content cuts to ~3%, this will no longer be an issue.

    Apple probably doesn’t even want Flash on their devices. It would mean that I could play flash games online instead of having to purchase an app through their store. That removes 30% of the app cost from their pockets..

  • Storm Williams

    … and the God awful, flyout flash banner ads!!!!

  • http://www.webwednesday.com.sg Joe@singapore

    Yeah. I know!!!! My 5 year old can only do freaking algebra, can’t even get an A in Mandarin and can only use a Mac. Why does he not get DOS commands?!@!#@#!@

  • Andy

    The example of flash you gave is just the reason I block flash on my browser. When I want to reserve a motel room I want to get to the relevant ASAP and not waste my time (and bandwidth) on some programers ego trip fluff.
    The sooner such flash crap is killed the better.

  • Walt French

    Pretty much on point. I’d say it’s not apps per se, it’s the freedom that if you want to do something, there’s probably a pretty good way to do it. For the iPhone, that’s apps, and the fact that tens of thousands of developers are out doing nifty things. Might be hardware: a dongle that could attach to a thumb drive. For some people it might be the fact that Apple provides a way to write Chinese quickly and easily. Whatever, with the iPhone’s proven software base, the iPad doesn’t even have to be as successful as the similarly dismissed iPhone is. There’ll be all sorts of apps, accessories, replacements, …

    In contrast: *IF* somebody like MSI actually starts selling their Android pad and *IF* its hardware is any good (big ifs, since their CES demo units were awful), you STILL have daunting odds against the company being able to continue in the US market with the high advertising, service and follow-on costs for successor products — that’s just the reality of the US computer & electronics market. If that happens — and I used to buy a lot of clever/cheapo products that were one-shots — then customers have a very uncertain future for being able to port your apps, your documents, your accessories, your skill in using the tools, etc.

    Not to overdo the FUD, but it’s reality. Will the iPad similarly be a one-shot disaster? If the comments here are any sign, its biggest flaw is the logo on it — lotsa Apple haters who don’t want to see it succeed. That same logic didn’t seem to have been very relevant to the iPhone, or to have stopped tens of millions of people from buying em. So every time I see people using “Koolaid,” “high price,” “XYZ’s non-shipping product will be way better and faster,” … as the reason not to buy this device, the more I assume there are not better arguments, or that reason hardly matters to the haters anyway.

  • Ianf

    @Kevin Stich, who “has this horrible creeping suspicion… a precursor [model with] features that should have been there from the beginning get added later for a fee”.

    Of course it’s a precursor model – they had to start somewhere. I don’t like to repeat myself, so read this about the APPARENT iPad pricing scheme: http://www.crunchgear.com/2010/01/29/developers-not-apple-will-make-or-break-the-ipad/#comment-1201200

  • yeah

    actually paul chapel, you mean regualr people use the app store because they have to and they don’t have much of an alternative if they want to use apple products, but i don’t know one normal person who actually likes the app store. the like barely reaches to the actual ui of the store which is as much as they will stand. the rest is pretty much like the ranting you’ll see online from apple and non apple fans who use the app store.

  • Arnie

    Love all the haters here. Poor PC fanboys can’t stand Apple coming out with another killer product. Well all I can say to U all is suk it!!! LOL.

  • eoin

    In general a good article. I doubt, however, that Macs will move away from the Intel chip. If so they lose the advantage of Boot Camp, and virtualisation without emulation.

    I know people who buy the Mac for the build quality to only run WIndows, and regardless of that subset of the market switchers like the idea of being able to run Windows occasionally.

  • Yasir

    The following has been debated to oblivion:
    -Battery Life
    -Lack of Flash support
    -USB/WebCam
    -Multitasking

    while each omission does take away from the potential of this device, which may be catered for in future software/hardware releases as is Apple’s typical strategy, what really bothers me is the confusion these devices have created with regards to a device being labeled and having the functionality of a ‘SLATE’ or a ‘TABLET’

    WIth all the penetration that Apple has with college students, and the ebook entry (textbooks), what would really have been a killer functionality is the ability to take notes, with a PEN, like an MS Tablet using OneNote. Finger Multitouch is not a replacement for this at all …

  • http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xb3i6c_TpZc John Dingler, Artist and Patriot

    I visited the URL and the site that you are promoting and touting as having good Flash design.

    I disagree; It had two splash screens. I first one was the default, then I had to click to open up the second, the latter opened slowly. Why is Flash this slow?

    I guess you are promoting Flash, slow Flash, and you are enamored with the art project rather than offering immediate content to the viewer who does not want to wait for the content to open up. Know what I mean?

    Aside from the slow Flash, why are you assaulting us with the counter. It’s as if it’s counting down to the next installment of LOST. Really bad for a website.

    And you forgot to make the rest of the site available, as if it took you so much time and effort to make the three splash screens that you were too exhausted to create the rest of the site. If you put the correct amt. of effort into the site proper, instead of the slowly-opening splash screens, your site might have been completed by now.

  • http://www.matutam.com Kevin Stich

    My “horrible creeping suspicion” was in jest (hence my hints at the iPad 3G and 3GS.)

    This is Apple we’re talking about. It’s been their business plan since the first iPod to sell a system with a not-the-best piece of hardware. They then incrementally update hardware and sell it for the same price. Apple’s “You’re used to our system, so no matter what hardware we release, even if it could be better, you’ll still buy it and then pay the same amount to upgrade slightly later” policy is what makes me despise them as a company. It might make for successful business, but it doesn’t mean I can’t hate them for it.

  • http://www.matutam.com Kevin Stich

    Multitasking: When people mention multitasking, they almost always mean multiple windows as well. Open up Safari next to your iChat window. Oh wait… copy -> home -> iChat -> select conversation -> paste.

    Camera: People want this for video chat, not for taking pictures.

    Flash: Here’s what I said above:

    “Eventually, HTML5 standards may be able to replace Flash. The problem is that HTML5 as a standard will not be complete and released until 2022, thats 12 YEARS.

    We live in the now, and now ~70% of interactive content online is in Flash. Deal with it. They are releasing this product in 60-90 days. If magically (haha) by that time Flash web content cuts to ~3%, this will no longer be an issue.

    Apple probably doesn’t even want Flash on their devices. It would mean that I could play flash games online instead of having to purchase an app through their store. That removes 30% of the app cost from their pockets.”

    Storage: 64GB flash drives are $150, 32GB ones are $75. That’s with a profit for the maker and reseller. Apple is selling a 64GB upgrade for $200. Something is wrong here. Also, 10hrs of battery life is wasted if you get the 16GB version and can only watch ~6-7hrs of video due to storage limitations.

    Uses: It’s great for content consumption, including product presentations. But I could never imagine working a spreadsheet with a keyboard where you have to switch back and forth to go from letters to numbers.

    Expandability: “There just isn’t room” is a joke. A SD/MMC/xD/MS adapter is 1” w X 2” l X .15” d. To imagine they are packed that tightly in this device is ridiculous. Wait until someone has a teardown and you’ll see.

    Data Input (disregarding people’s preference for tactical feedback because it’s opinion): The iPad has a curved back. I haven’t used one myself, but can imagine it rocking a little bit when typing with it on my knees or on the table. That would get annoying fast.

    Bezel: I can pick up my 15″ 5.5lb HP laptop by it’s .33″ bezel. There is no need for an inch wide one here.

    How is the argument that they will add more features to later products nonsense? I know people who were already using the iTunes system and bought iPhones, knowing full well they would buy a brand new one the day the 3G version came out. I can’t believe that people paid extra, and waited 2 years, for the ability to copy and paste on their smartphone. Apple knows that people are more willing to buy again than wait for the full featured product and exploit it very well.

  • Ryan

    The standard will not be complete for 12 years, but the most important feature sets are likely to be the ones completed first.

    Youtube and Vimeo have already started its switchover, and it will only be a matter of time before other video sites do as well.

    Canvas and SVG will undoubtedly be incorporated into various websites pretty soon as well.

    Once those happen, the majority of flash use cases will not need flash anymore

  • Viswakarma

    Apple’s iPad is the next geration of MacBook Air!

  • http://www.matutam.com Kevin Stich

    Just needs to be noted that it’s not only once those are incorporated, but also put into use by the sites in question. I wouldn’t want to redo all that work until it’s everywhere.

  • http://www.peylow.se Fredrik Olsson

    Turns out someone already has created a way to convert Flash content into HTML 5. More specifically a combination of Javascript and SVG. It is open source and in itself completely written in standard Javascript:
    http://github.com/tobeytailor/gordon

    Turns out that Gordon can be used to play Flash on todays iPhones. Here are a few demos you can try:
    http://paulirish.com/work/gordon/demos/

    Admittedly Gordon is not yet feature complete, but a proof that you can get there.

    A much faster way to get there would ofcource be if Adobe let their authoring tools target the open standards directly.

  • leslie

    I don’t know about you but I surely did understand that “mess” you’re talking about, if that’s your kind of definition of mess.

  • reggie

    Yes, I mean should it be really that way? Everytime we see another tablet here, should it be compared with the iPad? Okay we know the cupertino tablet made a fine-debut last January 27, but could we just stop the clamoring for a moment (engadget) — Those cross-referencing to the apple tablet is starting to clutter post/feeds in this site.

    Ah, yes, it really does looks like the comparison has begun.. iPad under fire: http://bit.ly/apple-ipad-scrutinized-details

  • Olternaut

    The iPad is not a blockbuster. What are ya some old white dude?

  • Olternaut

    You forgot something in ya list…..the unit’s UGLINESS both in hardware and initial home page gui.

  • http://www.m65jacket.com m65

    the only bad thing is it doesn’t have flash

blog comments powered by Disqus
Advertisement