Sensitivity to eye gaze in prosopagnosic patients and monkeys with superior temporal sulcus ablation
- PMID: 2290489
- DOI: 10.1016/0028-3932(90)90050-x
Sensitivity to eye gaze in prosopagnosic patients and monkeys with superior temporal sulcus ablation
Abstract
Accuracy at perceiving frontal eye gaze was studied in monkeys and human subjects using a forced-choice detection task on paired photographs of a single human face. Monkeys learned the task readily, but after bilateral removal of the banks and floor of the superior temporal sulcus (STS) they failed to perform the task efficiently. This result is consistent with the conclusion, based on recordings from single cells in awake, behaving monkeys [Perret et al., Physiological Aspects of Clinical Neuro-ophthalmology, Chapman & Hall, London, 1988] that this region of the temporal lobe is important for coding information about eye-gaze of a confronting animal. Human subjects were given identical stimuli in a task where they were asked to detect "the face that is looking straight at you". Human performance is sensitive to the degree of angular deviation from the frontal gaze position, being poorest at small angular deviations from 0 degrees. This was also true of monkeys viewing these stimuli, pre- and post-operatively. Compared with normal controls, two humans prosopagnosics were impaired at this task. However the extent of impairment was different in the two patients. These findings are related to earlier reports (including those for patients with right-hemisphere damage without prosopagnosia), to normal performance with upright and inverted face photographs, and to notions of independent subsystems in face processing.
Similar articles
-
Recognition of unfamiliar faces in prosopagnosia.Neuropsychologia. 1990;28(11):1143-61. doi: 10.1016/0028-3932(90)90051-o. Neuropsychologia. 1990. PMID: 2290490
-
Brain activation during eye gaze discrimination in stable schizophrenia.Schizophr Res. 2008 Feb;99(1-3):286-93. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2007.09.038. Epub 2008 Jan 8. Schizophr Res. 2008. PMID: 18248794 Free PMC article.
-
Visual response properties of single neurons in the temporal pole of behaving monkeys.J Neurophysiol. 1994 Mar;71(3):1206-21. doi: 10.1152/jn.1994.71.3.1206. J Neurophysiol. 1994. PMID: 8201413
-
On the modularity of face recognition: the riddle of domain specificity.J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 1995 Apr;17(2):256-75. doi: 10.1080/01688639508405122. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 1995. PMID: 7629271 Review.
-
Facial recognition 1990.Cortex. 1990 Dec;26(4):491-9. doi: 10.1016/s0010-9452(13)80299-7. Cortex. 1990. PMID: 2081388 Review.
Cited by
-
Dynamics of processing invisible faces in the brain: automatic neural encoding of facial expression information.Neuroimage. 2009 Feb 1;44(3):1171-7. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.09.038. Epub 2008 Oct 11. Neuroimage. 2009. PMID: 18976712 Free PMC article.
-
Structural brain abnormalities and suicidal behavior in borderline personality disorder.J Psychiatr Res. 2012 Apr;46(4):516-25. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2012.01.003. Epub 2012 Feb 14. J Psychiatr Res. 2012. PMID: 22336640 Free PMC article.
-
Are structural brain abnormalities associated with suicidal behavior in patients with psychotic disorders?J Psychiatr Res. 2013 Oct;47(10):1389-95. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2013.06.011. Epub 2013 Jul 15. J Psychiatr Res. 2013. PMID: 23866739 Free PMC article.
-
Genetic aspects of autism spectrum disorders: insights from animal models.Front Cell Neurosci. 2014 Feb 24;8:58. doi: 10.3389/fncel.2014.00058. eCollection 2014. Front Cell Neurosci. 2014. PMID: 24605088 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Face learning via brief real-world social interactions induces changes in face-selective brain areas and hippocampus.Perception. 2022 Aug;51(8):521-538. doi: 10.1177/03010066221098728. Epub 2022 May 11. Perception. 2022. PMID: 35542977 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources