Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2009 Aug 27;364(1528):2325-35.
doi: 10.1098/rstb.2009.0045.

The development of imitation in infancy

Susan S Jones  1
Affiliations
Review

The development of imitation in infancy

Susan S Jones. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. .

Abstract

An overview of existing data on imitation in infancy suggests that changes in the direction of imitation research are underway. The widely accepted view that newborn infants imitate lacks supporting evidence. Instead, existing data suggest that infants do not imitate others until their second year, and that imitation of different kinds of behaviour emerges at different ages. The evidence is consistent with a dynamic systems account in which the ability to imitate is not an inherited, specialized module, but is instead the emergent product of a system of social, cognitive and motor components, each with its own developmental history.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Abravanel E., Sigafoos A. D.1984Exploring the presence of imitation during early infancy. Child Dev. 55, 381–392 (doi:10.2307/1129950) - DOI - PubMed
    1. Abravanel E., Levan-Goldschmidt E., Stevenson M. B.1976Action imitation: the early phase of infancy. Child Dev. 47, 1032–1044 (doi:10.2307/1128440) - DOI - PubMed
    1. Anisfeld M.1991Neonatal imitation. Dev. Rev. 11, 60–97 (doi:10.1016/0273-2297(91)90003-7) - DOI
    1. Anisfeld M.1996Only tongue protruding modeling is matched by neonates. Dev. Rev. 16, 149–161 (doi:10.1006/drev.1996.0006) - DOI
    1. Anisfeld M.2005No compelling evidence to dispute Piaget's timetable of the development of representational imitation in infancy. In Perspectives on imitation: from neuroscience to social science, vol. 2: Imitation, human development, and culture (eds Hurley S., Chater N.). pp. 107–131 Cambridge, MA: MIT Press