Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2010 Jan;22(1):203-11.
doi: 10.1162/jocn.2009.21203.

Perception of face parts and face configurations: an FMRI study

Jia Liu  1 , Alison Harris, Nancy Kanwisher
Affiliations

Perception of face parts and face configurations: an FMRI study

Jia Liu et al. J Cogn Neurosci. 2010 Jan.

Abstract

fMRI studies have reported three regions in human ventral visual cortex that respond selectively to faces: the occipital face area (OFA), the fusiform face area (FFA), and a face-selective region in the superior temporal sulcus (fSTS). Here, we asked whether these areas respond to two first-order aspects of the face argued to be important for face perception, face parts (eyes, nose, and mouth), and the T-shaped spatial configuration of these parts. Specifically, we measured the magnitude of response in these areas to stimuli that (i) either contained real face parts, or did not, and (ii) either had veridical face configurations, or did not. The OFA and the fSTS were sensitive only to the presence of real face parts, not to the correct configuration of those parts, whereas the FFA was sensitive to both face parts and face configuration. Further, only in the FFA was the response to configuration and part information correlated across voxels, suggesting that the FFA contains a unified representation that includes both kinds of information. In combination with prior results from fMRI, TMS, MEG, and patient studies, our data illuminate the functional division of labor in the OFA, FFA, and fSTS.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Stimulus manipulations. The 2 × 2 design involved orthogonal manipulation of the presence versus absence of face parts (eyes, nose, and mouth; horizontal axis) and face configurations (the placement of these parts in a face arrangement vs. scrambled arrangement; vertical axis). External contours were either intact or removed.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Face-selective regions, the OFA, FFA, and fSTS, from an fMRI localizer scan (p < 10−4, uncorrected) in the right hemisphere of a typical subject, shown on a flattened surface. Sulci are shown in dark gray and gyri in light gray. Talairach coordinates and statistics for each ROI from a group analysis (right hemisphere): OFA (BA 18), coordinates = 46, −78, −7, voxel number = 118, max t value = 4.6; FFA (BA 37), coordinates = 43, −53, −12, voxel number = 71, max t value = 3.9; fSTS (BA 22), coordinates = 60, −51, 9, voxel number = 259, max t value = 6.3.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Responses of the FFA, the OFA, and the fSTS to face parts and configurations. Featural effect (left): The stimuli were pooled by the presence (black) versus absence (gray) of face parts. The hemodynamic responses of the face-selective regions were averaged across voxels, stimulus categories, and subjects. The y-axis indicates the percent signal change. The error bars show the standard error of the mean of the BOLD responses across subjects. Configural effect (right): The stimuli were pooled by whether stimuli contain veridical face configurations or not.
Figure 4
Figure 4
The correlation of the configural and featural effect in the FFA from a typical subject. (A) The featural effect was significantly correlated with the configural effect indexed by t values across voxels in both the right (r = .29) and left (r = .24, not shown) FFA. (B) Distribution of correlation coefficients for randomly shuffled pairs of configural and part effect across voxels pooled from both the right and left FFA. The vertical dotted line indicates the mean value (r = 0) of the correlation coefficients from the permutation test, and the solid line indicates the observed correlation coefficient.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Aguirre GK, Singh R, D’Esposito M. Stimulus inversion and the responses of face and object-sensitive cortical areas. NeuroReport. 1999;10:189–194. - PubMed
    1. Akiyama T, Kato M, Muramatsu T, Saito F, Nakachi R, Kashima H. A deficit in discriminating gaze direction in a case with right superior temporal gyrus lesion. Neuropsychologia. 2006;44:161–170. - PubMed
    1. Allison T, Puce A, McCarthy G. Social perception from visual cues: Role of the STS region. Trends in Cognitive Sciences. 2000;4:267–278. - PubMed
    1. Allison T, Puce A, Spencer DD, McCarthy G. Electrophysiological studies of human face perception: I. Potentials generated in occipitotemporal cortex by face and non-face stimuli. Cerebral Cortex. 1999;9:415–430. - PubMed
    1. Barbeau EJ, Taylor MJ, Regis J, Marquis P, Chauvel P, Liegeois-Chauvel C. Spatio temporal dynamics of face recognition. Cerebral Cortex. 2008;18:997–1009. - PubMed

Publication types