The cross-category effect: mere social categorization is sufficient to elicit an own-group bias in face recognition
- PMID: 17680942
- DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01964.x
The cross-category effect: mere social categorization is sufficient to elicit an own-group bias in face recognition
Abstract
Although the cross-race effect (CRE) is a well-established phenomenon, both perceptual-expertise and social-categorization models have been proposed to explain the effect. The two studies reported here investigated the extent to which categorizing other people as in-group versus out-group members is sufficient to elicit a pattern of face recognition analogous to that of the CRE, even when perceptual expertise with the stimuli is held constant. In Study 1, targets were categorized as members of real-life in-groups and out-groups (based on university affiliation), whereas in Study 2, targets were categorized into experimentally created minimal groups. In both studies, recognition performance was better for targets categorized as in-group members, despite the fact that perceptual expertise was equivalent for in-group and out-group faces. These results suggest that social-cognitive mechanisms of in-group and out-group categorization are sufficient to elicit performance differences for in-group and out-group face recognition.
Similar articles
-
Learning task affects ERP-correlates of the own-race bias, but not recognition memory performance.Neuropsychologia. 2010 Jun;48(7):2027-40. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2010.03.024. Epub 2010 Apr 1. Neuropsychologia. 2010. PMID: 20362599
-
The categorization-individuation model: an integrative account of the other-race recognition deficit.Psychol Rev. 2010 Oct;117(4):1168-87. doi: 10.1037/a0020463. Psychol Rev. 2010. PMID: 20822290
-
Holistic processing is tuned for in-group faces.Cogn Sci. 2009 Aug;33(6):1173-81. doi: 10.1111/j.1551-6709.2009.01048.x. Epub 2009 Jun 8. Cogn Sci. 2009. PMID: 21585500
-
The face and person perception: insights from social cognition.Br J Psychol. 2011 Nov;102(4):849-67. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8295.2011.02030.x. Epub 2011 May 24. Br J Psychol. 2011. PMID: 21988388 Review.
-
Perception and motivation in face recognition: a critical review of theories of the Cross-Race Effect.Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 2012 May;16(2):116-42. doi: 10.1177/1088868311418987. Epub 2011 Aug 30. Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 2012. PMID: 21878608 Review.
Cited by
-
Perceptual discrimination in the face perception of robots is attenuated compared to humans.Sci Rep. 2023 Oct 4;13(1):16708. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-42510-6. Sci Rep. 2023. PMID: 37794045 Free PMC article.
-
Inconsistent individual personality description eliminates the other-race effect.Psychon Bull Rev. 2011 Oct;18(5):870-6. doi: 10.3758/s13423-011-0127-4. Psychon Bull Rev. 2011. PMID: 21735332
-
Striatal Associative Learning Signals Are Tuned to In-groups.J Cogn Neurosci. 2016 Sep;28(9):1243-54. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_00971. Epub 2016 Apr 15. J Cogn Neurosci. 2016. PMID: 27082044 Free PMC article.
-
Both children and adults scan faces of own and other races differently.Vision Res. 2014 Sep;102:1-10. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2014.05.010. Epub 2014 Jun 11. Vision Res. 2014. PMID: 24929225 Free PMC article.
-
Social Vision: Functional Forecasting and the Integration of Compound Social Cues.Rev Philos Psychol. 2015 Dec;6(4):591-610. doi: 10.1007/s13164-015-0256-1. Epub 2015 May 7. Rev Philos Psychol. 2015. PMID: 29242738 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources