Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | pritambarhate's commentslogin

May be because you are not OpenAI user. I am. I find it useful and I pay for it. I don't want my data to be retained beyond what's promised in the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.

I don't think the Judge is equipped to handle this case if they don't understand how their order jeopardies the privacy of millions of users worldwide who don't even care about NYT's content or bypassing their paywalls.


You live on a pirate ship. You have no right to ignore the ethics and law of that just because you could be hurt in conflict related to piracy


The OpenAI Privacy Policy specifically allows them to keep data as required by law.


> who don't even care about NYT's content or bypassing their paywalls.

Whether or not you care is not relevant, and is usually the case for customers. If a drug company resold an expensive cancer drug without IP, you might say 'their order jeopardies the health of millions of users worldwide who don't even care about Drug Co's IP.

If the NYT is right - I can only guess - then you are benefitting from the NYT IP. Why should you get that without their consent and for free - because you don't care?

> (jeapordizes)

... is a strong word. I don't see much risk - the NYT isn't going to de-anonymize users and report on them, or sell the data (which probably would be illegal). They want to see if their content is being used.


> Why on earth would they delete their most valuable competitive advantage?

Becuase they are bound by their terms of service? Because if they won't no business would ever use their service and without businesses using their service they won't have any revenue?


What's wrong in it? LLM is a tool which makes one more productive.


I said "I am not saying it is wrong", but it is getting a bit tiring that every single README.md is the same. All I wanted to know is if it is wrong to assume.

It is not wrong, but at least put yourself into it a bit.


>> May I suggest that everyone just drop this whole 'develop/program it once, run it everywhere' slogan that just gets repeated endlessly when people try to promote their new platform/framework/library or whatever? I've never seen it work out that way in practice. Never.

Many apps that make hundreds of millions of dollars in revenue and have millions of users are built on cross platform technologies. (IntelliJ IDEs for example, and many Mobile apps which use same code for iOS and Android, Cursor, VS Code, etc). People use these apps even though they are not platform native and some of them have die hard fans too.


I mean if you have hundreds of millions of dollars in revenue anyway, then go ahead, feel free to use it


Google is trying to build the same with Flutter.

Kudos to the CogentCore team to build and ship this! Looks like this is made by a 2 people team. That's a lot of work to pull off!

I personally wanted something like this for Go for a while! Will try it out.


Just tried Qwen 3 32B 4bit and 8bit GGUF via Ollama today on RunPod A40 GPUs. For general knowledge questions the results were very underwhelming. Here are answers to 3 questions I asked to the 8 bit GGUF model (skipping the thinking tokens to keep it short):

Q: who won the cricket worldcup 2023?

A: The *2023 ICC Cricket World Cup* was won by *Australia*. They defeated *New Zealand* in the final on *November 19, 2023*, at the *M. A. Chidambaram Stadium in Chennai, India*.

### Key Details: - *Final Score*: Australia scored *334/5* in their 50 overs, while New Zealand reached *199/8* in their chase. - *Man of the Match*: Pat Cummins (Australia) with 5 wickets for 34 runs. - *Tournament Host*: India. - *Notable Performance*: Australia's aggressive batting and disciplined bowling sealed the victory, marking their *sixth Cricket World Cup title* (tying them with West Indies for the most titles).

This was the 13th edition of the ICC Cricket World Cup (50-over format). The T20 World Cup is a separate tournament, with India winning the 2024 edition. Let me know if you need further details!

total duration: 34.911890735s load duration: 65.034584ms prompt eval count: 20 token(s) prompt eval duration: 305.460537ms prompt eval rate: 65.47 tokens/s eval count: 511 token(s) eval duration: 34.539660654s eval rate: 14.79 tokens/s

Comment: Wrong - https://www.espncricinfo.com/series/icc-cricket-world-cup-20...

Q: give last 10 movies to win the oscar best picture award

Here is a clear and accurate list of the *last 10 Best Picture winners* at the Academy Awards, from *2014 to 2023*, including the ceremony year, the winning film, and the film's release year:

---

1. *2023 (95th Oscars)* - *Winner*: Everything Everywhere All at Once - *Release Year*: 2022

2. *2022 (94th Oscars)* - *Winner*: The Power of the Dog - *Release Year*: 2021

3. *2021 (93rd Oscars)* - *Winner*: Nomadland - *Release Year*: 2020

4. *2020 (92nd Oscars)* - *Winner*: Parasite - *Release Year*: 2019

5. *2019 (91st Oscars)* - *Winner*: Green Book - *Release Year*: 2018

6. *2018 (90th Oscars)* - *Winner*: The Shape of Water - *Release Year*: 2017

7. *2017 (89th Oscars)* - *Winner*: Moonlight - *Release Year*: 2016

8. *2016 (88th Oscars)* - *Winner*: Spotlight - *Release Year*: 2015

9. *2015 (87th Oscars)* - *Winner*: 12 Years a Slave - *Release Year*: 2013

10. *2014 (86th Oscars)* - *Winner*: Argo - *Release Year*: 2012

Comment: Answer number 2 ans 9 are wrong. (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Academy_Award_for_Best_Picture)

I would have expected it to get things which are such big events right at least.


I think at this moment all governments should start funding the open source foundations so that the foundations can train as well as retain good programming talent to keep the important open source software maintained. I think it will serve better in the long term to the government departments as well as the citizens.


If this is how we do it, there is the glaring vulnerability that a rogue administration could yank the rug on all these organizations and leave them scrambling for funding.


wouldn't that make the glaring vulnerability the constitution?


You mean a piece of paper with no inherent enforcement mechanisms?


the agreement that it represents. was that not clear?


Also creates an image that Netflix is a tech company!


I have wireless CarPlay in my car and I don't care about plugging it in for short rides. It's convenient that I don't have to plug it in every time I am on a 20-30 min ride just to get directions. It's a very useful feature. Not a deal breaker but a very good nice to have.



Yup. The specification is under Apache 2.0 and the Python package is under AGPL.

The full licenses can be found here: https://docs.wild-card.ai/about/licenses


AGPL is a great way to prevent people from adopting it.


This SDK isn't meant to be restrictive. This can be implemented into other open-source frameworks as a plugin(ie. BrowserUse, Mastra, LangChain, CrewAI, ...). We just don't want someone like AWS to flip this into a proxy service.

That said, what do you think is the right license for something like this? This is our first time doing OSS.


Consider applying for YC's Fall 2025 batch! Applications are open till Aug 4

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact