Skip to content

Hanging Together

the OCLC Research blog

  • Home
  • About
  • Subscribe to Hanging Together
Main Menu
Artificial Intelligence (AI) / Metadata / Research Library Partnership

Artificial intelligence to support metadata workflows: an OCLC RLP working group

May 14, 2025June 25, 2025 - by Merrilee Proffitt
A close-up view of a keyboard illuminated by vibrant, multicolored LED backlighting. The keys display a range of bright hues, including red, green, blue, and purple, creating a striking contrast against the dark background. The focus is on specific keys, such as "Alt" and symbols, with the lighting emphasizing their contours and making them visually prominent. The scene conveys a modern and tech-oriented aesthetic.
Photo by Antonino Visalli on Unsplash

The potential uses of artificial intelligence (AI) for metadata workflows have grown rapidly. As a result, there’s a greater need for resources that support metadata managers in leveraging AI to enhance the capabilities of their teams. To address these opportunities for the profession, the OCLC Research Library Partnership (RLP) Metadata Managers Focus Group (MMFG) recently kicked off the Managing AI in metadata workflows working group. The primary goal of the working group is to engage our collective curiosity, identify key challenges, and empower metadata managers to integrate AI into their workflows with confidence.

This community-driven effort builds on earlier RLP work on AI, including Responsible Operations: Data Science, Machine Learning, and AI in Libraries (2019), a Metadata Managers’ discussion on “Getting ready for AI” (2024), and the “Transforming Metadata: Getting ready for AI” panel at ALA (2024). The working group offers members of the MMFG an opportunity to dive deeper into a timely topic.

Our call for participation has attracted contributors from the UK, the United States, Canada, and Australia. During our first meeting, we took time to learn how our contributors are currently looking at AI opportunities in their workflows, including:

  • How can AI make workflows more efficient and effective?
  • How can AI services help reduce backlogs of materials by creating brief records?
  • What are the best practices for AI to help libraries with non-Latin script materials?
  • How can AI be used to augment metadata workflows for institutional repositories, research data/information management ecosystems, and cultural heritage digital asset management platforms?

We discussed some of the challenges that Metadata Managers are currently facing. Broadly, our conversation touched on:

  • People: How to engage in change management within metadata organizations, from supporting existing staff to thinking about future competencies. This includes thinking about how AI can help staff navigate complex cataloging rules and best practices.
  • Economics: How to build financial support for AI into library budgets, including for services, training, and future staffing.
  • Metadata and platforms: How can metadata managers assess AI platforms and features, especially to understand how to apply them to specific parts of metadata workflows (e.g., generating records, quality control, entity management/authority control)?
  • Collections: How to learn about the different kinds of machine learning or AI, and which ones are best suited for different collection types. For example, computer vision can be used to generate metadata for photography vs. subject analysis of Electronic Theses and Dissertations (ETDs).
  • Professional values and ethics: How can metadata managers explore the above questions/areas while championing professional values and ethics and honoring commitments to protect and steward our collections responsibly and sustainably?

These topics were used as a starting point for a deeper exploration in our three workstream groups, which are currently meeting on a regular cadence:

  • Primary cataloging workflows
  • Metadata for special/distinctive collections
  • Institutional repositories

Thanks to our working group members for carrying this important work forward!

  • Helen Baer, Colorado State University
  • Michael Bolam, University of Pittsburgh
  • Jenn Colt, Cornell University
  • Elly Cope, University of Leeds
  • Susan Dahl, University of Calgary
  • Michela Goodwin, National Library of Australia
  • Amanda Harlan, Nelson-Atkins Museum of Art
  • Miloche Kottman, University of Kansas
  • Chingmy Lam, University of Sydney
  • Yasha Razizadeh, New York University
  • Jill Reilly, National Archives and Records Administration
  • Mia Ridge, British Library
  • Tim Thompson, Yale University
  • Mary Beth Weber, Rutgers University
  • Cathy Weng, Princeton University
  • Helen Williams, London School of Economics

We expect work to conclude by the end of June, with additional blog posts about our findings to follow.  Stay tuned!

Merrilee Proffitt

Merrilee Proffitt is Senior Manager for the OCLC RLP. She provides community development skills and expert support to institutions within the OCLC Research Library Partnership.

OCLC Research

Hanging Together is the blog of OCLC Research. Learn more about OCLC Research on our website.

Stay Connected

Sign up to have Hanging Together updates sent directly to your inbox and to keep up with the latest news about OCLC Research.

Links

  • Next – OCLC Blog
  • OCLC Research
  • OCLC Research Library Partnership
  • WebJunction

Categories

  • Archives and Special Collections (229)
  • Artificial Intelligence (AI) (21)
  • Born-Digital Special Collections (15)
  • Collaboration (30)
  • Collections (3)
  • Collective Collections (124)
  • Data Science (16)
  • Digital Preservation (70)
  • Digitization (25)
  • Equity, Diversity, Inclusion (EDI) (99)
  • Evolving Scholarly Record (12)
  • Higher Education Future (9)
  • Identifiers (44)
  • Infrastructure and Standards Support (109)
  • Libraries (103)
  • Libraries Archives and Museums (136)
  • Libraries in the Enterprise (3)
  • Library Futures (11)
  • Library Management (15)
  • Linked Data (60)
  • Measurement and Behaviors (44)
  • Metadata (128)
  • Miscellaneous (176)
  • Modeling new services (113)
  • MOOCs (7)
  • Museums (58)
  • New Model Library (2)
  • Open Access (21)
  • Renovating Descriptive Practice (131)
  • Research Data Management (31)
  • Research Information Management (52)
  • Research Library Partnership (231)
  • Research support (70)
  • Resource Sharing (12)
  • Searching (38)
  • SHARES (12)
  • Social Interoperability (35)
  • Supporting Scholarship (69)
  • Systemwide Organization (42)
  • User Behavior Studies and Synthesis (18)
  • Visual Resources (17)
  • Web Archiving (14)
  • WebJunction (8)
  • Wikimedia (43)

Share Buttons

  • Bluesky
  • Facebook
  • Linkedin
  • Twitter
  • Outlook
  • Gmail
  • Yahoo Mail
  • Email

Recent Comments

  • Isabel Quintana on World of cats meets real cat: My thoughts on the ultimate library quilt
  • Kem Lang on World of cats meets real cat: My thoughts on the ultimate library quilt
  • Kelly Sattler on World of cats meets real cat: My thoughts on the ultimate library quilt
  • Renee Mercer on World of cats meets real cat: My thoughts on the ultimate library quilt
  • Trenton James on Navigating the future of special collections metadata by using insights from the past 

Categories

Archives

More about OCLC Research

Visit our web site.

Recent Posts

  • Roles for resource sharing practitioners in making library materials accessible
  • Efficiënt ontdubbelen in WorldCat: hoe AI en catalogiseerwerk elkaar versterken
  • Deduplicación eficiente de WorldCat: Equilibrando la IA y la catalogación profesional
  • Leading through uncertainty: Fostering morale and connection in challenging times 
  • World of cats meets real cat: My thoughts on the ultimate library quilt

Policy Links

  • Code of Conduct
  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy Statement

Admin.

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org

Cookies used on Hanging Together
© 2024 OCLC || ISSN 2771-4802